JPOOL / COMMUNITY GOOD

Validator Council.

The Validator Council reviews applications to the JPool Community Good program. Five validator operators decide which contributions to the Solana ecosystem receive Community Good support.

Meet the Council
Independent reviewEvidence-led scoring12-month term
THE PURPOSE

Why a Council?

Community Good exists to support validators who build something genuinely valuable for Solana: tools, infrastructure, education and research that other people use.

Building a website or a dashboard now takes an hour. The fact that a product exists says little about its value. We need people who know the Solana ecosystem well, who validate on Solana and build tools, and who can judge what is actually useful. That is why the review now sits with a Council of experienced operators.

THE PEOPLE

Meet the members

Five operators with hands-on experience across Solana infrastructure, research and validator operations.

01 / 05
Chair

Hervé Guillemet

Validator Puffin

Hervé is an engineer, researcher and operator of the Puffin validator. His open-source contributions aim to evolve the chain so that users can trade with confidence. An early adopter of Frankendancer, he pushed its performance to the limit. Now he is designing an innovative scheduler for Firedancer, grounded in original concepts.

02 / 05
Council member

Lu

Validator Validator 1

Lu is a software and infrastructure architect who operates large-scale validator and RPC infrastructure at Jupiter. He independently runs Validator 1 and is an active part of the Alpenglow cluster, auditing new code, running validators and onboarding new operators through the agSOL stake pool. On testnet, his oneSOL pool delegates to newcomers. He contributes to open-source validator software, including Firedancer and solana-validator-ha.

03 / 05
Council member

Viktor

Validator CryptoVik

Viktor has run CryptoVik, an independent Solana validator, since 2021. He builds open tools and a public dataset that track how Solana stake pools and delegation programs distribute stake. He shares his research as notes and explainers in English and Ukrainian. Viktor is an active member of Superteam Ukraine, where he takes part in startup programs and hackathons and helps develop the Ukrainian validator community.

04 / 05
Council member

Johann Focke

Validator Blocksize

Blocksize is an active Solana infrastructure and data company focused on validator operations, open-source tooling, governance and high-quality market data. The team contributes to multiple oracle networks, including Pyth, and has supported the development of open-source validator monitoring infrastructure, the continued operation of the Solana Governance NCN, and early Alpenglow testing and feedback. Johann represents Blocksize as COO and brings this operational, data and ecosystem experience to the Council.

05 / 05
Council member

Vijay Pondini

Validator Decentra

Vijay is a Solana validator operator and server hosting provider who advocates for geographic decentralization. With his hosting company Decentra Cloud, he helps move significant validator stake outside of Europe and the USA. He is passionate about promoting fair and transparent validators in the ecosystem.

Members serve a 12-month term.

THE METHOD

How the Council works

A consistent process designed to reward work that can be demonstrated and checked.

01

Evidence first

Applications are judged on verifiable results: repositories, usage, public artifacts and third-party confirmation. Claims without evidence do not score.

02

Independent scoring

Each member scores every application on their own, without seeing other members’ scores, and writes a justification for each score.

03

A robust average

Each application needs at least four valid scores. The highest and the lowest are dropped, and the rest are averaged.

04

One public result

Only the final aggregated score is published. Individual scores and justifications stay confidential.

FAIR REVIEW

Conflicts of interest

Clear boundaries protect the independence of each review.

  • A member does not score an application when they have a commercial, employment, hosting or infrastructure relationship with the applicant, or any other financial interest in the applicant.
  • Each applicant can ask one named Council member to step aside from reviewing their application.
  • During their term, a member’s own validator keeps its Community Good points but receives no delegation from the Community Good bucket.
WHAT COMES NEXT

The first Council cycle

From a refined framework to public results, the first cycle follows five stages.

  1. 01

    Calibration

    The Council refines the scoring framework.

  2. 02

    New application form

    JPool publishes the updated form and scoring framework.

  3. 03

    Applications

    All eligible validators can apply to Community Good.

  4. 04

    Review

    The Council scores the applications.

  5. 05

    Results

    Final scores are published and delegation is updated.

Dates for each stage will be announced on X and Discord.

FAQ

Good to know

Key details for validators interested in Community Good.

Community Good documentation
Any validator that meets the Community Good eligibility requirements can apply.
No.
You will see your final aggregated score.
They keep their current score until the results of the new cycle are published.